论文部分内容阅读
香港大学何冠彪先生撰写的《浙东学派问题平议》(刊载于《清史论丛》第七辑,以下简称“平议”),对于上自清朝章学诚、下至当代陈训慈所论述的清代浙东史学的源流提出不同的见解。笔者拜读之余,对其引证之博雅、行文之犀利甚表钦佩,但对其中心论点不敢苟同。归纳起来,主要有以下三个问题值得商榷,一、所谓浙东学派的“家法互相传受”之说从何而来?二、章学诚对浙东学术的总结是否符合历史科学?三、邵廷采应否属于浙东学派?试分述之:
“Problems of East Zhejiang School of Pingdingshan,” by Mr. He Guanbiao of Hong Kong University (published in the seventh series of “Qing History Symposium”, hereinafter referred to as “Ping Ping”), for Qing Dynasty from Zhang Ching-cheng of the Qing Dynasty, Origins of Eastern Zhejiang History put forward different views. Apart from reading the author, the citation of its liberal, very sharp and very admired, but its central argument can not agree. To sum up, there are mainly three questions that are worth discussing. First, the so-called East Zhejiang School “family law spread each other,” said where come from? Second, Zhang Xuecheng summary of eastern Zhejiang science is consistent with the history of science? Should belong to East Zhejiang school? Test points: