论文部分内容阅读
从大革命开始,法国宪政体制的发展轨迹一直都是螺旋式前进的。在不同时期,代表保守的“维护国权”与代表激进的“保障民权”两种政治意识形态都是此消彼长的竞合关系,也伴随有相互的妥协与融合。法国违宪审查制度的发展就体现了这种不同政治思想之间的竞合、妥协与融合。不同于美国宪政体制的“自由主义”价值取向,法国的违宪审查体制总是随着主流的政治形态变化而变化,且始终处于两种政治意识形态博弈之间。通过考察不同时期法国政治思想发展与违宪审查制度演进的互动关系,我们可以很清楚地发现这一特点,进而更全面审慎地思考我国宪政体制的发展路径。
From the beginning of the Great Revolution, the development path of the constitutional system in France has always been a spiral forward. At different times, the two conservative political ideologies of “safeguarding national rights” and “safeguarding civil rights” representing the radical “are all counterproductive and mutually reinforcing relations and are accompanied by mutual compromise and integration. The development of France’s constitutional review system reflects the competition, compromise and integration between different political thoughts. Different from the ”liberalism" value orientation of the constitutional system in the United States, the system of reviewing unconstitutional acts in France always changes with the change of the mainstream political forms and is always in between two kinds of political ideological games. By examining the interactive relationship between the development of the French political thought and the evolution of the constitutional review system in different periods, we can clearly find this feature and then think more comprehensively and cautiously about the development path of our constitutional government.