论文部分内容阅读
目的:对应对量表(COPE)的结构效度进行探索和验证。方法:使用COPE分别对北京市21所高校1725名研究生(随机分为两个样本,样本1=828,样本2=897)以及某国家机关419名工作人员(样本3)进行施测。结果:首先使用研究生样本1对COPE可能存在的二阶因子进行探索性因素分析(EFA),得到3个二阶因子;然后使用研究生样本2对EFA所得到的二阶模型以及竞争模型进行验证性因素分析(CFA),并同时对样本3进行跨样本的结构效度检验。结果显示,一阶相关模型拟合度指数(χ2/df=2.76/2.04,CFI=0.855/0.828,GFI=0.849/0.788,AGFI=0.828/0.758,NFI=0.792/0.715,IFI=0.857/0.831,RMSEA=0.044/0.043)基本符合统计学要求,优于其他竞争模型。结论:COPE的维度结构更符合一阶模型,因子间存在不同程度的相关。
Objective: To explore and verify the structural validity of coping scale (COPE). Methods: 1725 graduate students (randomly divided into two samples, sample 1 = 828, sample 2 = 897) from 21 colleges and universities in Beijing and 419 staff from a state organ (sample 3) were tested with COPE. Results: First, using the sample 1 of the graduate student, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the possible second-order factor of COPE was conducted to obtain three second-order factors. Then, the second-order model of the EFA and the competing model Factor analysis (CFA), and at the same time, sample 3 was tested for cross-sample structural validity. The results showed that the first-order correlation coefficient (χ2 / df = 2.76 / 2.04, CFI = 0.855 / 0.828, GFI = 0.849 / 0.788, AGFI = 0.828 / 0.758, NFI = 0.792 / 0.715, IFI = 0.857 / 0.831, RMSEA = 0.044 / 0.043) basically meet the statistical requirements, better than other competing models. Conclusion: The dimension structure of COPE is more consistent with the first order model, and the factors are related to different degrees.