论文部分内容阅读
媒体对突发公共卫生事件进行报道,虽然满足了公众知情权的需要,有利于疫情防治,但也存在对隐私权侵犯之可能,故两者间应予平衡。新闻自由及公众知情权与隐私权的保障之间并无先后顺位的差异,何项权利应优先保护,须视具体个案的情形而作具体考量。我国《传染病防治法》和《突发公共卫生事件应急条例》应当赋予新闻媒体报道突发公共卫生事件的权利,并明确隐私权的保护。
Although the media coverage of public health emergencies has met the needs of the public’s right to information and is good for the prevention and control of the epidemic, there is also the possibility of infringement of privacy rights, so the two should be balanced. There is no difference between the freedom of the press and the public’s right to information and the protection of privacy. Priority should be given to what rights should be protected and specific consideration should be given to the circumstances of a particular case. The Law of the People’s Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases and the Emergency Regulations on Public Health Emergencies should give the news media the right to report sudden public health incidents and clarify the protection of privacy rights.