本文首先对蒯因与卡尔纳普关于分析性的争论作出评析,指出卡尔纳普基本上同意蒯因用于驳斥分析性的那些论点而否认它们会对分析性带来不利的影响,然后表明其实蒯因所抨击的分析性与卡尔纳普所支持的分析性是两类不同的语言学概念——用蒯因的术语说——作为超越的概念的分析性与作为内在的概念的分析性。最后指出,蒯因后来也接纳了分析性,而且按照他的观点,其分析性也是一个内在的概念。 In the first part of this article, I analyze the analysis of Karna Napoleon’s analysis of the issue of analysis and point out that Carnap agreed basically that he should deny the negative impact on analysis due to those arguments used to refute the analysis,分 Analytical nature of criticism and analyticity supported by Carnap are two different linguistic concepts - in Genesis terms - analytical and transcendental analytic as transcendental concepts. Finally, he points out that analytics was later accepted analytically, and in his opinion analyticity is also an inherent concept.