论文部分内容阅读
甲:近年来,名之曰“新”曰“前卫”曰“先锋”之作甚多,其中一些晦涩难解,高深玄妙,可使观众如堕五里雾中.不知有没有简便适用的艺术评价标准,能使我们处变不惊,从容应对?乙:现今的艺术评价活动都是以己度人,哪有通用的标准?官方展览会、商业拍卖行、私人收藏者、职业批评家、学院教师爷各有眼光.你我这样的普通观众,凭感觉判断就是了,不必求什么标准.甲:没有标准怎么判断?出售商品要有质量检验,打官司要有法律依据,艺术价值的衡量也不能完全无序、毫
A: In recent years, the name of “new” saying “avant-garde,” said “pioneer” for many, some of them obscure, profound mysterious, so that the audience as falling into the fog in. I do not know there is no simple art evaluation criteria , Can make us feel at ease, calmly deal with? B: Today’s art evaluation activities are based on man, how can there be common standards? Official exhibitions, commercial auction houses, private collectors, professional critics, college teachers, A normal audience, you and I feel the judgment is, do not have to ask what standards. A: There is no standard how to judge? The sale of goods to have quality inspection, litigation must have a legal basis, the measure of artistic value can not be completely out of order , Milli