论文部分内容阅读
张君劢、钱穆两先生均为现代新儒学之重要人物,然其为学路径不同,故对中国传统政治之性质、对儒家义理转生现代政制之前景,持有大体相反的看法,而发生或隐或显之争论。张君劢认为,构建现代中国之良好政制之路是自移植西方民主,钱穆先生则以为可在儒家文明内部转生创发。由此,两人对孙中山先生之五权宪法方案也持完全不同的看法:钱穆支持,而张君劢反对。此一分歧实贯穿19世纪末以来之现代儒学发展,今日则展开为港台儒学与大陆新兴政治儒学之争。
Although both Zhang Junmai and Qian Mulu are important figures in modern Neo-Confucianism, they hold generally opposite views on the nature of Chinese traditional politics and on the prospect of the reincarnation of Confucianism from the modern political system. However, Or obviously controversial. Zhang Junmai believes that the road to building a good constitutional system in modern China is the self-transplanting of Western democracy, while Qian Qian thinks that it can be reincarnated within Confucian civilization. As a result, both hold entirely different views on the constitutional plan of the right of Mr. Sun Yat-sen: Qian Mu supports and Zhang Junmai opposes it. This disagreement consistently runs through the development of modern Confucianism since the late 19th century, and today it is the debate over the Confucianism between Hong Kong and Taiwan and the emerging political Confucianism in the Mainland.