论文部分内容阅读
在我国,“不动产是否适用善意取得”问题之争不再是法律效果之争,承认不动产善意取得,并不意味必然构建囊括动产与不动产相统一的善意取得制度。在以德国为代表的国家,不动产善意取得最终在法典上与动产善意取得区分设计。另外对于妥当地解释《中华人民共和国物权法》第106条规定的不动产善意取得的构成要件,对于保障交易安全、维护真实权利人的物权以及完善我国不动产登记制度具有重要意义。
In our country, the dispute over the issue of whether “acquisition of real property by goodwill” is no longer a dispute over the legal effect. And recognizing that the acquisition of real estate in good faith does not mean that it is necessary to construct a system of bona fide acquisition that includes the unification of movable and immovable property. In a country represented by Germany, real estate was finally acquired in good faith by the bona fide purpose of distinguishing design from movable property in the code. In addition, it is of great significance to properly explain the elements of bona fide acquisition of real property stipulated in Article 106 of the “Property Law of the People’s Republic of China” for securing trade transactions, safeguarding the real rights of real people and improving the real estate registration system in China.