论文部分内容阅读
我国的“李伯康房产继承案”为我们揭示了原先决问题理论体系存在的不足,主要体现在对先决问题与案件前提问题两概念的混淆上。究其本质,作为判定主要问题前提条件的实体问题,应称为前提问题;先决问题则是指判定前提问题可适用的冲突规范冲突合并准据法矛盾情况下如何适用法律的法律选择问题。实际影响案件判决的应是前提问题。实践中,对前提问题的判定,在不同的情况下,应分别适用法院地冲突规则指引的准据法、国家间的相互承认条约或对等原则、并对是否存在法律规避等情况作出考查。
Our country “Li Bokang real estate inheritance case ” reveals the shortcomings of the original problem-solving theoretical system, which is mainly reflected in the confusion of the two concepts of the pre-determined problem and the prerequisite of the case. To study its essence, the substantive issues that are the prerequisites of determining the main issues should be called the prerequisite questions; the prerequisite questions refer to the legal choice of how to apply the law under the conflict of the applicable law. The actual impact on the case decision should be a prerequisite. In practice, judgments on preconditions should be separately applied to the applicable law guided by the conflict rules in the courts, the mutual recognition treaties or the reciprocal principle between countries, and the existence of legal evasion.