论文部分内容阅读
不少学者将乾隆朝珐琅彩瓷的终止与当时杰出督陶官唐英去世产生必然联系,但若考查历史资料会发现该观点并不确切。从瓷胎画珐琅制作技术角度讲,乾隆中期的珐琅彩瓷制作已经相当成熟,并不存在唐英之后瓷胎工艺不合格等问题。乾隆珐琅彩瓷的前期制品由于传世品资料丰富、造办处珐琅作档案保存相对完善,人们对该时期制品的认识也就相对深入,但是对乾隆朝中、后期珐琅彩瓷制品而言,制作档案资料与确凿的传世品资料都不太多,因此人们对该类制品的认识也就显得相对模糊。根据现有乾隆中、后期珐琅彩瓷落款、制作风格等情况来看,可以将该时期珐琅彩瓷的分为两大类内务府造办处珐琅作制品与景德镇御厂制品。
Many scholars have made the necessary connection between the end of Qianlong’s enameled porcelain and the then outstanding director Tang Guan’s death. However, if we look at the historical data, we can find that this view is not definite. Enamel painting from the perspective of the production of ceramic technology point of view, Qianlong mid-enamel porcelain production has been quite mature, there is no Tang Ying after the failure of porcelain and other issues. Qianlong enamel porcelain pre-products as a result of the world-rich product information, making office enamel for the preservation of the file is relatively sound, people in the period of understanding of products will be relatively in-depth, but the Qianlong Dynasty porcelain products, the late enamel production File information and conclusive information on the world are not too many, so people’s understanding of such products also appears to be relatively vague. According to the existing Qianlong, late enamel porcelain inscribed paragraph, production style, etc., can be enameled porcelain that period can be divided into two categories House House Office enamel products and Jingdezhen Royal Plant products.