论文部分内容阅读
在陈淳所处的宋代,理学与心学的争论成了中国思想史上的一个新问题。当朱子理学遭遇到很大的困境时,陈淳作为朱子十分器重的亲传弟子,挺身而出,护卫师门,在解释、阐发朱子固有思想的基础上,又有所推进和发明,对于朱子理学的传承、光大做出了不可磨灭的贡献。本文拟从“性即理”与“心即理”、“人心”与“道心”、以及儒家“工夫论”等三个方面来略论陈淳对象山心学的批驳,以期对人们进一步认识陈淳的基本理学思想及“朱陆之辨”的历史渊源略有助益。
In the Song Dynasty where Chen Chun was in, the controversy between Neo-Confucianism and psychology became a new issue in the history of Chinese thought. When Zhu Zeng-hui encountered a great predicament, Chen Chun, as a very dear disciple of Zhu, came forward and escorted the guardian gate. On the basis of explaining and elucidating Zhu Zi’s inherent thought, Chen Chun promoted and invented another. Inheritance, Everbright made an indelible contribution. This article intends to give a brief account of Chen Chun’s object mountain from three aspects: “nature is the principle” and “heart is the principle”, “people’s heart” and “the heart”, and Confucianism “ Psychology of criticism, with a view to people to further understand Chen Chun’s basic Neo-Confucianism and ”Zhu Luzhi " history is slightly helpful.