论文部分内容阅读
人文社会科学的评价问题在当前引发了许多争议和非议。专家系统及其同行评议在中国所受干扰太多,伴随“学术经济化”的现象出现了评价者角色的失范。量化评价方法具有一定的合理性,但它毕竟只是管理的工具,其作用不可高估,在学术活动中仅供参考。在现实情况下,学术机构的官本位决定了学术独立的困难,过度行政化导致学术腐败。人文社会科学的发展要求与之相适应的评价体系,但评价体系往往具有滞后性和有限性,突破性成果不符合评价标准之事时有发生,必须了解对评价体系的这个基本限制,努力寻求超越之道。
The evaluation of humanities and social sciences has caused much controversy and criticism at present. There are too many interferences of expert systems and their peer review in China. With the phenomenon of “academic economy”, there is an anomie in the role of appraiser. Quantitative evaluation method has some rationality, but after all, it is only a management tool, its role can not be overestimated, in academic activities for reference purposes only. In reality, the official status of academic institutions determines the difficulty of academic independence. Over-administration leads to academic corruption. The development of the humanities and social sciences requires an evaluation system that is suitable for it. However, the evaluation system is often lagging and limited. Breakthrough results do not always meet the criteria for evaluation. It is necessary to understand this basic restriction on the evaluation system and strive to seek Beyond the road.