论文部分内容阅读
目的：探究腹股沟疝患者接受腹腔镜疝修补术和无张力疝修补术治疗的临床疗效及其差异性。方法：以本院近年来收治腹股沟疝患者80例为本次研究对象，根据治疗方案差异将其分为腹腔镜组与无张力组，腹腔镜组患者接受腹腔镜疝修补术治疗，无张力组接受无张力疝修补术治疗，每组各有患者40例。对比2组患者各项临床指标以及复发情况。结果：患者完成治疗后对其各项临床指标如手术所需时间、术中出血量、手术费用、住院费用等进行记录对比，观察组患者相对于对照组有显著优越性，差异存在统计学价值（P＜0.05）；术后对患者进行平均1个月随访，观察组患者并发症发生率低于对照组，差异有统计学价值（P＜0.05），2组患者均无发现复发情况。结论：腹股沟疝为当前临床常见疾病，腹腔镜疝修补术与无张力疝修补术对此类患者均有突出的临床治疗效果，但综合各个方面考虑，腹腔镜疝修补术优势更为明显，从生理、心理和经济等各方面缓解患者负担，值得临床重视与推广。“,”Objective To explore the clinical effect and difference of laparoscopic hernia repair and tension free hernia repair for inguinal hernia patients. Methods In our hospital in recent years treated patients with inguinal hernia in 80 cases as the research object, according to the differences in treatment regimens will the laparoscopic group and the group without tension. Results Patients after completion of therapy on clinical indexes such as surgery required time, intraoperative blood loss, operation expenses and hospitalization expenses were recorded and compared, patients in the observation group compared with the control group had significant superiority, the difference is statistically value (P<0.05);after operation of patients on average 1 month follow-up and observation group of patients the incidence of complications was lower than the control group, the difference is statistically value (P<0.05). Patients in the two groups were no found recurrence. Conclusion Inguinal hernia for current clinical common disease, laparoscopic hernia repair and no tension hernia repair of such patients have a prominent clinical curative effect, but each aspect comprehensively considered, the advantages of laparoscopic hernia repair is more obvious, from the physiological, psychological, social, and economic and other parties to ease the burden on patients, is worthy of attention and promotion.