论文部分内容阅读
目的:检验中文版认知方式问卷及合成分数与最大值两种认知易感操作化方式在大学生中的适用性.方法:用中文版认知方式问卷测量了426名大学生,并在8周后对其中60人进行了重测.部分被试完成了贝克抑郁问卷和归因方式问卷.结果:①总问卷的克龙巴赫Alpha系数为0.94,8周后的重测信度为0.59;②认知方式问卷的合成分数及最大值与同时施测的抑郁问卷总分、归因方式问卷总分都存在显著相关;③认知方式问卷的合成分数与最大值之间相关为0.91.结论:中文版认知方式问卷具有较好的信效度,可以用来测量我国大学生的认知方式.合成分数与最大值两种操作化方式具有一致性,建议采用合成分数.“,”Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Cognitive Style Questionnaire(CSQ).Methods: The Chinese version of CSQ was used to assess 426 college students,60 of them participated the retest 8 weeks later.Beck Depression Inventory(BDI) and Attributional Style Questionnaire(ASQ) were used as the criteria-related validity instruments.Results: ①Cronbach's a coefficient of the Chinese version of CSQ was 0.94,test-retest reliability was 0.59;②The composite score and the highest score of CSQ had significant correlation with BDI and ASQ which were tested in the same time;③The correlation of the composite score and the highest score was 0.91.Conclusion: The Chinese version of CSQ has acceptable psychometric quality.The composite score has extensive overlap with the highest score.