论文部分内容阅读
替代性纠纷解决方案(ADR)起源于美国20世纪30年代劳动争议的解决,具有效率高、成本低、保密性强的优点,已经用来解决多种类型的民事争议。在美国,越来越多的当事人以及律师为避免进入不堪重负的对抗制司法体系,转而寻求替代性的纠纷解决方式。以美国ADR实践的相关判例为切入点,从司法豁免权这一微观视角对ADR制度进行探讨,涉及ADR的内在价值、功能意义以及与正式司法程序的关联等问题。
The Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) originated in the U.S. settlement of labor disputes in the 1930s. The advantages of high efficiency, low cost and high confidentiality have been used to solve many types of civil disputes. In the United States, more and more parties and lawyers have turned to alternative forms of dispute resolution in order to avoid entering the overwhelming and antagonistic judicial system. Based on the relevant jurisprudence of ADR practice in the United States, this paper discusses the ADR system from the microscopic perspective of judicial immunity, which involves the intrinsic value of ADR, its functional significance and the connection with the formal judicial process.