论文部分内容阅读
前言 在模拟紧急撤离演习中,对乘客逃生的实验性评定会提供不同的结果,而这种结果正取决于这样的变量,即受试者促动因素的水平和在特定的研究中所采用的逃生通路。在本报告的研究中用充气逃生滑梯与用和舱门踏板同高平台连接硬质便梯相比作为逃生通路,在单一研究内,提供一种竞争性对合作性的受试者行为的比较。方法 共设4组受试者,年龄范围是20～40岁,从事于2(促动因素水平)×2(逃生通路)×2(空气质量)的重复测试计划。促动因素水平是组间因素,逃生路线和空气情况(空气清洁与有烟尘进
INTRODUCTION The experimental assessment of passenger evacuation in simulated emergency evacuation maneuvers provides different results, and the outcome depends on the variables that are the level of motivation for the subject and the level of motivation used in the particular study Escape route. The use of inflatable escape slides in this report as escape routes compared to rigid stairways connected to a high deck with a hatchback provides a competitive comparison of co-operative subjects’ behavior within a single study . Methods A total of four groups of subjects aged 20-40 years were enrolled in a repeat testing program at 2 (actuator level) × 2 (escape route) × 2 (air quality). The level of antecedent is the factor between groups, the route of escape and air conditions (air clean with soot