论文部分内容阅读
我国首例教育法庭实际上是“特别专审非独立型”教育审判机构模式的一种尝试。作为特殊历史阶段的改革伴生物,这一模式与我国当下的“兼审非独立型”教育司法审查模式相比较,特殊之处就在于其形式上的“独立性”和实质上的“半司法半行政”特点。随着我国现阶段涉诉教育案件日趋复杂化和专门化,教育审判组织和从业人员亦需要走向独立化和专职化。因此,反思我国首例教育法庭的经验和教训,根据各国教育司法实践,中国特色的“普通专审相对独立型”教育法庭当为我国未来教育司法审判模式改革的理性选择。
China’s first educational court is actually an attempt to “specialize in non-independent” educational trial institutions. Compared with the current judicial review model of “concurrently reviewing non-independent” education in our country, as a reforming creature in a special historic stage, this model is characterized by its formal “independence” and its substantive “Semi-judicial semi-administrative ” features. With the increasing complexity and specialization of litigation education cases in our country, educational trial organizations and practitioners also need to become independent and full-time. Therefore, we should reflect on the experience and lessons learned from the first educational court in our country and according to the judicial practice of education in all countries, the educational court of “relatively independent” type with Chinese characteristics should be the rational choice for the reform of our country’s future education judicial trial.