论文部分内容阅读
第一 ,我们在编辑方针上是独立的 ,我们应当发表什么内容由我们自己来判断。关于作者所投论文的决定由我们与专家审稿人协商作出。但我们没有编委会 ,所以我们经验非常丰富的编辑人员可以不受约束的就哪些论文会对不同领域产生重大影响作出自己成熟的判断。完全独立的另一个好?
First, we are independent in our editorial guidelines. We should judge what we should publish. Decisions on the author’s thesis are made by us in consultation with expert reviewers. But we do not have an editorial board, so our highly experienced editors are free to make their own judgments about which essays will have a significant impact on different areas. Completely independent of another good?