论文部分内容阅读
我国学界法律论证理论的研究对于推进我国司法改革和法治建设发挥了积极作用。相对于司法论证理论的研究而言,对立法论证的研究则基本处于空白状态。立法论证研究不足,主要是由于受制于法律中心主义和法院中心主义的研究范式,同时也由于司法论证与立法论证研究对象复杂性不同和论证模式不同。目前,西方国家的法律论证研究的重心已经转向立法论证,鉴于我国立法论证研究基本尚属空白,为此需要借鉴西方立法论证理论,实现由司法论证向立法论证的转向,为我国制度建设和法治建设提供理论支持。
The study of legal argumentation theory in academia has played a positive role in promoting judicial reform and the rule of law in our country. Compared with the research of judicial argumentation theory, the research of legislative argumentation is basically in a blank state. The lack of research on legislative argumentation is mainly due to the fact that it is subject to the research paradigm of legal-centrism and court-centrism as well as the complexity of the object of argumentation and the complexity of the objects of the judicial argument and the legislative argument. At present, the research center of legal argumentation in western countries has turned to legislative demonstration. In view of the fact that the basic research of our country’s legal argumentation is still blank, it is necessary to draw lessons from the theory of western legislative argumentation to realize the shift from judicial argumentation to legislative demonstration. Construction to provide theoretical support.