本文通过对高鹗续本的浅说,以及后人对此续本或疏、或注、或评、或续的点评加以自己的观点,认清这部作品的瑕疵,为红学研究者提供一点思路。曹氏之书遗世之后使“情人”、“学者”痴迷欠憾、悬想万端。大约不到半个世纪的酝酿就出现了首先“圆梦”的高鹗。近百年来指责高续本“思想性有悖曹旨”、“艺术性逊于曹笔”。这两大方面的疵责都十分中肯。却也必然。把 This article through to the superficial renewal of the superficial sayings, as well as the descendants of the continuation or sparse, or note, or comment, or continued comments on their own point of view, identify the flaws in this work, for HongZhong researchers to provide a little idea . Cao’s book after the world so that “lover ”, “scholar ” obsessed with regret, suspense Wan ends. About less than half a century of brewing appeared first “dreams ” Gao Yi. Nearly a hundred years accused of high perpetuation “ideological contrary to Cao Zhi ”, “artistic inferior to Cao Pen ”. These two major aspects of blame are very fair. But also inevitable. Put