陈佩嫣老师对高中历史课本《太平天国运动》一章中关于太平天国的悲剧说明了什么的一段文字提出了两点异议 :一是农民阶级不能领导中国革命取得胜利只是阶级局限性使然 ,与时代局限性毫无关系 ;二是由于时代的不同 ,农民革命可以有胜利和失败两种截然不同的结果。(下简称陈文)陈文的观点及论证粗看起来不无道理 ,但仔细推敲 ,似还存在不少问题。最大的问题是出在对“农民革命”这一概念的定义上 Teacher Chen Peiyi raised two points of disagreement about what paragraph of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom’s tragedy chapter in the history textbook “The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom Movement” explained: First, the peasant class cannot lead the Chinese revolution to gain victory only because of class limitations, and the limitations of the times. There is no relationship; second, because of the different eras, the peasant revolution can have two distinctly different results: victory and failure. (Abbreviated as Chen Wen) Chen Wen’s arguments and arguments may seem unreasonable, but careful scrutiny seems to have many problems. The biggest problem lies in the definition of the concept of “peasant revolution.”