论文部分内容阅读
【目的】探讨异地终审会提高科技期刊学术质量和影响力的效果。【方法】2015年4-6月,在总结《中国实用妇科与产科杂志》8年来异地终审会效果的基础上,通过查阅既往文献,比较异地终审会与本地终审会的差异,以及异地终审会在提高期刊学术质量及影响力方面的优势。【结果】与本地终审会相比,异地终审会专家学科知识涵盖更全面,可减小审稿的地域局限性;减轻本地编委终审压力,调动异地编委审稿积极性;更加强了编辑部与编委的沟通和联系;扩大了期刊的学术质量和影响力,提高了被引频次和影响因子。【结论】异地终审会可以达到提高期刊学术质量和影响力的目的。
【Objective】 To explore the effect of remote end-review on improving the academic quality and influence of sci-tech periodicals. 【Methods】 From April to June 2015, based on the conclusion of the effectiveness of the remote review in the field of “Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics of China” over the past 8 years from April to June 2015, by referring to the previous literatures and comparing the differences between the local and local final review conferences, Advantages in improving academic quality and influence of journals. [Results] Compared with the local final review meeting, the expert knowledge of remote end-of-conference experts covered a more comprehensive and can reduce the regional limitations of peer review; reduce the pressure of the final editorial of local editorial board, mobilize the editorial enthusiasm of the editorial board of different places; And the editorial board of communication and contact; expand the academic quality and influence of journals, improve the citation frequency and impact factor. 【Conclusion】 The remote end trial can achieve the purpose of improving academic quality and influence of periodicals.