论文部分内容阅读
诉讼模式,即法院审判案件具体运作方式,是审判方式改革的重大课题.当前,在法院改革日益深化的形势下,如何选择和定位我国的诉讼模式,法学理论界与司法实务已进行了值得肯定的研究和探索,并在坚持职权主义还是移植当事人主义的问题上,形成了以当事人主义为主导的移植说,主张法院审判方式改革应当放弃职权主义,普遍推行当事人主义,借以摒除当前审判中存在的种种弊端.笔者认为,移植当事人主义模式并非绝对不可行.但是该学说所论述的几个主要论点,似有必要进一步商榷.现试作新议,以求教于同仁.
At present, under the circumstance of increasingly deepening court reform, how to choose and locate the litigation mode of our country, and the jurisprudence field of law and judicial practice have been worthy of affirmation And insisted on the doctrine of authority or transplanting the doctrine of the parties, the formation of a transplanting led by the doctrine advocated reform of the court trial should abandon the doctrine of power, universalist advocacy in order to get rid of the current trial exists The author believes that transplanting the party mode is not absolutely not feasible.However, the doctrine discussed several major arguments, it seems necessary to further discuss.Now try to make new proposals to learn from colleagues.