论文部分内容阅读
在刑事诉讼法再修改研究过程中,理论界和实务界普遍主张我国应当借鉴对抗制诉讼模式,降低羁押率,扩大简易程序适用范围。对抗制以发达的律师辩护制度为存在前提,以对抗性的文化为支撑。我国不具备实行对抗制诉讼模式的制度基础和文化条件,因而增强职权因素,强调公、检、法机关的客观义务,可能是更好的选择。同样,我国也不具备降低羁押率、扩大简易程序适用范围的条件,所以缩短羁押期限、减少办案环节才是我国提高诉讼效率的基本途径。
In the course of revising the criminal procedure law, theoretic circles and practical circles generally hold that our country should learn from the mode of adversarial system litigation, reduce the detention rate and expand the scope of the summary procedure. The adversarial system is based on the precondition of a well-developed lawyer’s defense system and supported by a culture of confrontation. Our country does not have the institutional basis and cultural conditions for practicing the adversarial litigation mode. Therefore, enhancing the power and authority and emphasizing the objective obligations of the public authorities, the prosecutors and the legislature may be a better choice. Similarly, our country does not have the conditions to reduce the rate of detention and expand the scope of application of summary procedures. Therefore, shortening the period of detention and reducing the number of handling cases are the basic ways for our country to improve the efficiency of litigation.