论文部分内容阅读
独立上诉权被认为是诉讼当事人的一项核心权利。我国刑事诉讼法虽规定了被害人的当事人地位,却并未赋予其独立的上诉权,使得其当事人的地位名不副实。被害人是遭受犯罪侵害的直接对象,其权利的保障有助于实现刑事诉讼保障人权、惩罚犯罪的双重目的,缓解被害人在诉讼活动中的边缘化趋势,促进刑事诉讼的公正、效益及法治的实现。故应赋予被害人独立的上诉权。尽管有观点认为:被害人作为独立上诉人不符合公诉案件的性质,可能造成角色冲突,增加二审法院的负担,但是,我们认为,从诉讼发展趋势来看,赋予被害人独立上诉权有其立法先例;从诉讼原则来看,被害人独立上诉权与我国刑事诉讼的原则并无不可调和的矛盾;从诉讼效率来看,赋予被害人独立上诉权并未从根本上影响诉讼效率;从诉讼结构来看,赋予被害人独立上诉权并不会导致诉讼结构的失衡与二审流于形式。
An independent right of appeal is considered a core right of the litigant. Although the Criminal Procedure Law of our country stipulates the victim’s litigious status, it does not give it an independent right of appeal, making its party’s position unworthy of the name. Victims are the direct target of crime infringement. The protection of their rights helps to realize the dual purposes of criminal procedure to protect human rights and punish crime, and to ease the marginalization trend of victims in litigation activities and to promote the fairness and effectiveness of criminal procedure and the realization of the rule of law . Therefore, the victim should be given an independent right of appeal. Although there is a view that the victim as an independent appellant does not meet the nature of public prosecution cases, it may cause conflicts of roles and increase the burden on courts of second instance. However, in our opinion, given the tendency of litigation, there is a legislative precedent for giving victims the right of independent appeal. Judging from the principle of litigation, there is no irreconcilable contradiction between the victim’s right of independent appeal and the principle of criminal procedure in our country. From the point of view of litigation efficiency, giving litigant independent right of appeal does not fundamentally affect the efficiency of litigation. Judging from litigation structure, The victim’s right of independent appeal does not lead to the imbalance of litigation structure and the second instance.