论文部分内容阅读
《青海社会科学》1989年第4期,发表了题为《试论毛泽东的主客体观》的文章。作者陆云彬认为,长期以来,在毛泽东哲学思想的各种教科书中,只是提主观与客观,认识与实践的问题,几乎没有提到主体与客体的问题,以致给人们造成了似乎毛泽东不讲主体与客体问题的错觉。其实,毛泽东哲学思想的科学体系中,这一问题占有极其重要的地位,这一点在《毛泽东哲学批往集》中得到了佐证。作者从三个方面进行了论证:一是主体的能动性。作者引证列宁的话说,主体既是指人或人类,也是指人的思想或意识。前者是基本含意,后者是借用和引伸的含意,后者是由前者派生出来的,没有前者就没有后者,毛泽东明确批注“抽象的人与具体的人。”言外之意,费尔巴哈作为唯物主义的典型代
“Qinghai Social Sciences” 1989 the fourth period, published an article entitled “On the subject and object of Mao Zedong,” the article. Author Lu Yunbin believes that for a long time, in various textbooks of Mao Tse-tung’s philosophical thought, it is only a matter of mentioning subjectivity, objectivity, cognition and practice. Almost without mentioning the issue of subject and object, it has caused people to see Mao Tse-tung’s failure to talk about subject and The illusion of the object problem. In fact, this issue occupies an extremely important position in the scientific system of Mao Tse-tung’s philosophical thought. This point has been corroborated in the “Criticism of Mao Zedong’s Philosophy”. The author demonstrates from three aspects: First, the initiative of the subject. The author quotes Lenin as saying that the subject refers not only to man or man but also to the thought or consciousness of man. The former is the basic meaning, the latter is the meaning of borrowing and extension, the latter is derived from the former, without the former, there is no latter, Mao Zedong made it clear that “abstract people and specific people.” The implication, Feuerbach as a The typical generation of materialism