“驳回上诉,维持原判”,上海市第一中级法院的一纸判决书宣告了易趣卖家“快乐之源”店店主李先生上诉失败,他要求玫琳凯公司赔偿其因名誉侵权而造成的精神损害抚慰金和经济损失均没有获得法院支持。“官司输赢其实无所谓,并不影响我继续在易趣经营玫琳凯产品,但我想告诉玫琳凯公司,低价货是市场自身调节的作用,谁也无法阻止,我甚至有可能继续上诉玫琳凯,法官曾建议我以经济赔偿的名义继续上诉……”李先生这样告诉记者。随后李先生又向记者表示:“其实我更希望能与公司合作,获得网上代理授权,而不是对抗下去。” “Dismissed the appeal and upheld the original verdict,” a paper verdict of the Shanghai No.1 Intermediate Court declared that Mr. Lee, the owner of “Happy Source” store of eBay seller, failed to appeal and asked Mary Kay to compensate for the mental damage caused by reputation infringement Neither gold nor economic loss have been supported by the courts. “Actually winning or losing the case does not matter, does not affect me to continue to operate Mary Kay Kay products in eBay, but I want to tell Mary Kay company, low-cost goods is the role of market regulation, no one can stop, I may even continue to appeal Mary Kay, the judge had suggested I continue to appeal in the name of financial compensation ... ... ”Lee told reporters. Mr. Lee then told reporters: “In fact, I also hope to cooperate with the company, get the Internet proxy authority, rather than confrontation.”