论文部分内容阅读
我国《公司法》在第一百八十三条和《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国公司法〉若干问题的规定(二)》中首次规定了公司僵局的司法救济制度,但没有涉及到除了调解、收购股份和减资以外的其它方法。虽然用了一个“等”以示补充,但是仍然让人感到公司僵局救济制度的单薄,这也很容易在实践中造成法官对自由裁量空间把握的疑惑。美国公司僵局救济制度为我国法院在处理有限责任公司僵局案件时的救济方法提供了有益的借鉴,我国法院可以立足国情,充分将法律赋予的裁量空间和公司的自治理念相结合,善用司法调解,妥善处理公司僵局。
China’s “Company Law” provides for the first time the system of judicial relief for corporate impasse in Article 183 and the “Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China (II)”, but it does not refer to In addition to mediation, acquisitions and other means of capital reduction. Although the use of a “” “” to show that supplements, but still make people feel the corporate deadlock relief system is thin, it is easy to cause the judge in practice to grasp the discretion of the space doubt. The American corporation deadlock relief system provides a useful reference for our country’s court to deal with the remedies of the impasse of the limited liability company. Our country court can make full use of the judicial mediation by combining the discretionary space conferred by law with the autonomy idea of the company based on national conditions. , Properly handle the corporate deadlock.