李退溪和奇高峰关于四端七情的辩论是韩国儒学史上重要的哲学争论,二者的辩论均以朱子学说和语录为依据,但得出的结论却大相径庭。一方面因为二人对朱子思想和语录的理解有别,另一方面则由于朱子思想体系与《孟子》本意之间亦有差异。本文将以李退溪和奇高峰之间的四端七情辩论为依据,分析李退溪的四端七情论证中与朱子观点的不同,着重揭示李退溪以“理发”说诠释“四端”与朱子学说之间的歧异。 Li Duxi and Qi Qifeng’s debate on the emotions of the four ends is an important philosophical debate in the history of Confucianism in South Korea. Both debates are based on the Zhuci doctrine and the quotations, but the conclusions drawn are very different. On the one hand, because of their different understandings of Zhu Zi’s thoughts and quotations, on the other hand, there are also differences between Zhu’s ideology and Mencius’s original intention. This article will take Li Dao Xi and Qigao peak between the four ends of seven emotions debate as the basis, analysis Li Dao Xi’s four end emotions argumentation and Zhu Zi point of view is different, focusing on revealing Li Duanxi to “haircut ” interpretation "four ends Disagreement with Zhu’s theory.