论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨2种胸腔闭式引流管固定方法的临床护理效果。方法:50例胸腔闭式引流术的气胸患者采用随机数字表法分为两组。实验组和对照组25例,比较2组病人的引流管固定效果及病人的舒适影响度。结果实验组胸腔闭式引流管折叠发生率与对照组比较,差别无统计学意义(p>0.05);实验组胸腔引流管脱出发生率明显少于对照组(p<0.05)。实验组对胸腔引流管固定的舒适影响度明显低于对照组(p<0.01)。结论:胸腔引流管固定使用C型导管固定装置效果优于传统固定法,值得临床推广。
Objective: To investigate the clinical nursing effects of two methods of thoracic closed drainage tube fixation. Methods: Fifty cases of pneumothorax with thoracic closure drainage were divided into two groups by random number table. The experimental group and the control group were 25 cases. The drainage tube fixation and patient comfort were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of pleural closed drainage tube in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (p> 0.05). The incidence of thoracic drainage tube in the experimental group was significantly less than that in the control group (p <0.05). The comfortable influence degree of the experimental group on the chest drainage tube fixation was significantly lower than that of the control group (p <0.01). Conclusion: The C-catheter fixation device is better than the traditional fixation method in the treatment of chest drainage, which is worthy of clinical promotion.