杨凤城在《北京党史》 2 0 0 0年第 6期撰文认为 ,目前党史研究在发挥“资政育人”的意识形态功能方面做得比较好 ,在学术规范化方面虽然取得很大成绩 ,但存在明显不足 ,其中一个重要问题是党史研究者应树立关于党史学的两种规范和话语系统的意识 ,在学术研究中尽可能地从客观? According to Yang Fengcheng’s “History of the Party in Beijing,” No. 6, 2000, the article argues that at present, the study of the history of the party has done a good job in giving play to the ideological function of “educating people with resources,” and has made great achievements in academic standardization. However, there are obvious shortcomings. One of the important issues is that the party history researchers should establish their awareness of the two norms and discourse systems of the history of the Party, and try to be as objective as possible in academic research.