论文部分内容阅读
2005年12月31日,某大学以某大研院(2005)25号文作出《关于撤销陈某硕士学位的决定》。该决定称:陈某在报考我校1995年硕士学位研究生时,伪造大专毕业学历,以同等学历身份报考我校。陈某凭伪造的学历取得入学资格,我校决定宣布陈某的毕业证书无效。根据《中华人民共和国学位条例》(下称《学位条例》)第17条的规定,经学位评定委员会第二届五次会议决定,撤销陈某的硕士学位。陈某收到上述决定后,向该大学申请行政复议,学校不予答复。陈某遂在法定期限内向广州市海珠区人民法院提起了行政诉讼,要求法院撤销某大学关于宣布其毕业证书无效并撤销其硕士学位的决定,责令某大学向其赔礼道歉并承担本案诉讼费用。一、法院裁判要旨2006年6月27日,广州市海珠区人民法院作出(2006)海法行初字第15号行政判决书,以陈某的舞弊行为
On Dec. 31, 2005, a university made a Decision on Revoking Chen’s Master’s Degree with the letter No. 25 of a large research institute (2005). The decision said: Chen in 1995 when I applied for a master’s degree graduate student, forged college graduation qualifications, with the same academic qualifications apply for our school. Chen with fake academic qualifications to obtain admission, our school decided to declare Chen’s diploma is invalid. According to Article 17 of the Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on the Degree of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the “Academic Degrees Regulations”), the 5th session of the second session of the Academic Degrees Assessment Committee decided to revoke the master’s degree of Chen. Chen received the above decision, the university to apply for administrative reconsideration, the school will not reply. Chen subsequently filed an administrative lawsuit with Haizhu District People’s Court in Guangzhou within a statutory time limit, demanding that the court should revoke the decision of a university to announce the invalidation of its diploma and withdraw its master’s degree, order a university to apologize to the party and bear the litigation costs of the case. First, the court referee essentials June 27, 2006, Guangzhou Haizhu District People’s Court made (2006) Haifa Xing Chu Zi No. 15 administrative verdict to Chen fraud