论文部分内容阅读
我国立法对以引诱、欺骗方法讯问采取了泛道德化的否定立场,虽然立法对由此获取的供述网开一面,但这种否定立场仍强化了侦查讯问及至整个刑事司法的秘密化倾向,不利于对引诱、欺骗讯问方法进行合理规制。犯罪的本质决定了讯问方法的道德低标准性,以引诱、欺骗方法讯问具有一定的正当性,各国也在一定限度内赋予其合法性。我国应以不会引起虚假供述作为将引诱、欺骗讯问方法合法化的标准,并以对讯问全程录音录像、对律师开放讯问录音录像和在审查起诉、审判阶段谨慎审查犯罪嫌疑人、被告人认罪的自愿性作为配套措施。
Although China’s legislation has adopted a generic morally negative attitude toward the interrogation of temptations and deceptions, although the legislation opens up one side to the confession network thus obtained, this negative position still reinforces the tendency of investigating, interrogating and decontaminating the entire criminal justice. Benefit from the temptation to deceive interrogation methods for reasonable regulation. The essence of crime determines the low standard of morality of the interrogation method, and there is a certain legitimacy in interrogation by means of lure and deception. All countries also give it legitimacy to a certain extent. My country should make a sound examination of the suspects and defendants in the stage of examining and prosecuting prosecutors and prosecutors by making transcripts of interrogation recordings and interrogations of transcripts and interrogations of transcripts and recordings of transcripts of interrogations and deceptive interrogations not subject to false confessions, Voluntary as an accessory measure.