本文从厌辩症的背景入手,进而阐述了厌辩症的概念和危害,随后本文结合《苏格拉底的申辩》的内容重点说明了哲人们的无知之知,不断探索的精神。从中我们可以看出苏格拉底是个非常谦虚的人,此后,《斐多》中说明了两种人容易陷入厌辩症中,本文对这两种人进行了分析。最后,本文论述了苏格拉底对人性以及厌辩症的看法和论证。苏格拉底认为要纠察我们的论证,重新起航,注重论证的过程,而不单单是结果。 This article begins with the background of defibrillators, and then elaborates the concept and the harm of defibrillators. Then the article focuses on the ignorance of the philosophers and the spirit of constant exploration in the light of the content of “Socrates’ defense”. From which we can see that Socrates is a very modest man, since then, “Fido” in the description of two kinds of people easily fall into the threat of illness, the paper analyzed the two kinds of people. Finally, this article discusses Socrates’ perceptions and arguments about human nature and an anger-like illness. Socrates believes that we should pick up our argument, set sail again, and focus on the process of argumentation, not just the result.