论文部分内容阅读
目的比较简易空气灌肠器与电脑遥控灌肠整复仪对小儿肠套叠的整复效果,探讨一种有效、安全的空气灌肠设备。方法收集我院近年来小儿肠套叠行空气灌肠整复病例215例,其中117例小儿肠套叠使用简易空气灌肠器行空气灌肠整复;98例小儿肠套叠采用电脑遥控灌肠整复仪的脉冲工作方式做空气灌肠复位治疗。结果 117例使用简易空气灌肠器治疗的小儿肠套叠整复成功101例(成功率86.3%),98例采用电脑遥控灌肠整复仪治疗的小儿肠套叠整复成功93例(成功率94.9%),后者整复成功率明显高于前者(P<0.05)。结论电脑遥控灌肠整复仪比简易空气灌肠器更有效、安全。
Objective To compare the recuperation effect of simple air appliance and computerized remote enema on pediatric intussusception to explore an effective and safe air enema device. Methods In our hospital in recent years, 215 cases of intussusception air enema reconstructive cases, of which 117 cases of intussusception using simple air enema air enema reconstructive; 98 cases of children with intussusception using computer remote enema Integrative Instrument Pulse work done air enema reduction treatment. Results A total of 101 children with intussusception were successfully treated with simple air appliance in 101 cases (success rate was 86.3%). Ninety-three children with intussusception were successfully treated with computerized remote enema device (success rate was 94.9 %), The latter was significantly higher than the former (P <0.05). Conclusion The computer remote enema is more effective and safer than the simple air appliance.