长期以来，史学界对清代乾嘉时期史家史学批评问题的研究可谓是空白，无人问津。近年来才有人关注这个问题，写出了一些专论文章①。但是，这些学术成果大都局限于对个别史家史学批评的内容与具体方法的研究，没有从方法论的角度加以概括和总结。笔者在此基础之上，曾经对乾嘉 For a long time, historians and scholars on the history of historiography criticism during the Qing and Qian period can be described as blank, nobody cares. In recent years, some people have paid attention to this issue and wrote some monographs. However, most of these academic achievements are limited to the study of the content and specific methods of individual historians’ criticisms, which are not summed up and summarized from the perspective of methodology. On this basis, I have on the Ganjia