纯以里尔克的“诗是经验”和埃德加·坡的“诗作为智识的任务”这样烂熟的论断,来规划“游”在当代诗中纷杂呈像的解释进路,难逃过分怠惰、过度简化之嫌。但,老调重弹的好处在于,一些对当代诗的基本理解可以在这样的框定中得到强调性的确认;预先做出清障,有助于摒除掉那些最不应该进入讨论范围的议题。在“游之诗”(避免使用“记游诗”这一命名的用意,稍后会谈到)这个看似细微局限、实则外延宽宏的文体上,有关诗之“经验” Purely Rilke’s “poem is experience” and Edgar Poe’s “poem as the task of knowledge,” so sophisticated argument, to plan “travel Explain the way, escape too much lazy, too simplistic suspicion. However, the benefit of the old-fashioned rebuttal is that some basic understanding of contemporary poetry can be emphatically confirmed in such a framework; making pre-emptive strikes can help eliminate the issues that should not be the least discussed. In the poem ”Traveling Poems“ (to avoid using the meaning of ”poem", we will talk about later) this seemingly subtle limitations,