论文部分内容阅读
通过对2010年至2011年发生在韩国的18起真实案件的影子陪审团评议过程的观察和评议录像的内容分析,研究了陪审团裁决的约束力、陪审员数量、定罪和量刑方面的陪审团评议以及法官对陪审团评议的介入。总体来说,影子陪审团轮流发言积极参与评议程序,并且陪审员在辩论过程中彼此尊重,出现误解法律、混淆定罪和量刑事实的情况比预想的少。陪审团规模与评议质量之间没有决定性的关系。尽管令人鼓舞的和有待改进的方面并存,但是韩国陪审团评议的整体质量还是不错的。随着时间流逝,韩国的陪审制度有望逐步发展为一种能够加强普通民众的民主参与并提高司法公信力的稳定的制度。
Through a content analysis of observations and commentaries on the shadow jury process in 18 real cases from 2010 to 2011 in South Korea, jury rulings on jury verdict, jury number, conviction and sentencing were examined Commentary and judge intervention in jury deliberations. In general, shadow juries take an active part in the review process by turns, and jurors respect each other during the debate, with less than expected misunderstandings, confusion and sentencing. There is no decisive relationship between the size of the jury and the quality of the comment. Despite the encouraging and improving aspects, the overall quality of the South Korean jury reviews is still good. With the passage of time, the jury system in South Korea is expected to gradually develop into a stable system that will enhance the democratic participation of ordinary people and enhance the credibility of the judiciary.