论文部分内容阅读
出卖人将动产进行多重买卖,这有违诚实信用的交易规则,可能会给买受人带来不必要的损失。为了保护正当受让人的利益,最高院出台了《最高人民法院关于审理买卖合同纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》。试图通过交付说,交付价款优先说,合同成立在先说等学说确定多重买卖的所有权归属问题。因其违背了意思自治,债权平等性而备受争议。这些标准不利于解决问题,在一定程度上成为出卖人规避法律的跳板。因此本文就此进行探讨并建议。
It is contrary to the rules of honesty and trust that the seller trades the movable property in multiple ways, which may result in unnecessary losses to the buyer. In order to protect the interests of the legitimate assignee, the Supreme People’s Court promulgated the “Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Cases of Dispute over Sales and Purchase Contract”. Attempting to determine the ownership of multiple transactions through the doctrine of delivery, the priority of payment, the doctrine of contract establishment, and so on. It has been controversial because of its violation of the autonomy of means and the equality of claims. These standards are not conducive to solve the problem, to a certain extent, become a springboard for the seller to evade laws. Therefore, this article discusses and suggests this.