论文部分内容阅读
论理的武断,其情形大抵和一个病人完全拒绝治疗没有两样。所以林语堂先生称:“当一个作家因为憎恶一个人,而拟握笔写一篇极力攻击他的文章,但另一方面并没有看到那个人的好处时,这个作家便是没有写作这篇攻击文章的资格。”这话是说得偏激了些,因为论敌间在相当多的时候是不可能完全发现对方的好处的。这个要求似乎不高。但林先生的话也确有合理的成分。譬如,除了写检讨或悔过书之类的文字外,著文论理总是要阐述自己认为是正确的观点。
Arguments of arbitrariness, its situation and probably a patient completely refused to treat no different. Therefore, Mr. Lin Yutang said: “When a writer despises a man and writes a hard-boiled article, but on the other hand he does not see the man’s benefit, the writer did not write about the attack The qualifications of the article. ”This is an exaggeration because it is impossible for the enemy to find the full benefit of each other for quite a long time. This requirement does not seem high. However, Mr. Lin’s remark does have a reasonable composition. For example, in addition to writing or reviewing books or repentance of the text, the text argument is always to elaborate what they think is the right view.