论文部分内容阅读
2010年司法考试卷三第83题在公布答案后引起了较大的争议,该题牵涉直接证据与间接证据的划分标准问题。从国内的主流观点来看,划分标准主要涉及两个要素:证明关系和证明对象。直接证据对案件事实的证明关系是直接的,且能够证明案件的主要事实。如果仅靠证明关系来划分,将造成同一证据在同一诉讼中同时具有直接证据和间接证据双重属性的问题,所以不宜采纳该观点。鉴于司法考试的性质,在客观题或非开放性主观题的命题中应当尽量与国家级统编教材衔接,避免因学术观点不同而损害考生的利益。
The third volume 83 of the 2010 Judicial Examination Volume arouses greater controversy after the publication of the answer, which concerns the issue of the criteria for the classification of direct evidence and indirect evidence. From the domestic mainstream point of view, the division of standards mainly involves two elements: to prove the relationship and the object of proof. The proof of the direct evidence on the facts of the case is straightforward and can prove the major facts of the case. It is not appropriate to adopt the view that if the division of proof only results in the same evidence having the dual attributes of direct evidence and indirect evidence in the same lawsuit. In view of the nature of the judicial examination, in the propositions of objective questions or non-open subjective questions, we should try our best to link with the national compilation of teaching materials, and avoid damaging the interests of candidates because of different academic views.