论文部分内容阅读
1997年4月我接受正见永申律师事务所的委派，担任袁殊名誉权案原告方代理律师。经过近一年的调查研究，我对本案形成几点看法。一、尹骐书中并未作现出作者后来声称的所谓“两个定位”袁殊子女状告尹驶及其出版社后，尹曾对采访他的记者一再声称，其写的《潘汉年传》、《潘汉年
In April 1997, I accepted the appointment of Zhengxian Yongshen Law Firm as the plaintiff’s attorney for Yuanzhu’s reputation right. After nearly a year of investigation and study, I made a few observations on the case. I. Yin Qi’s book did not show what the author later claimed that the so-called “two-position” Yuan children sued Yin and its publisher. Yin once interviewed him and his reporter repeatedly claimed that the “Pan Han Nian Biography” "Pan Han years