论文部分内容阅读
目的:检验冗思反应量表简版(10-item Ruminative Response Scale,RRS-10)在抑郁症状阴性和阳性大学生人群中的测量等值性,并探讨抑郁与冗思的关系.方法:7842名中国在校大学生完成了RRS-10和流调中心抑郁量表(Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale,CES-D).根据CES-D的划界分,有7347名大学生为抑郁阴性组,495名为抑郁阳性组.结果:单组验证性因素分析结果表明RRS-10的两因子结构在抑郁症状阳性组和阴性组样本中均拟合良好.多群组验证性因素分析的结果表明RRS-10在抑郁症状阳性组和阴性组两样本间达到部分等值.独立样本t检验结果表明抑郁症状阳性组在冗思总体水平、沉思因子及反思因子上的得分显著高于抑郁阴性组.结论:RRS-10在抑郁阳性组和阴性组两样本间具有部分等值性.抑郁阳性个体的冗思水平显著高于抑郁阴性个体.“,”Objective:This study aimed to test the measurement equivalence of the Chinese version of the 10-item Ruminative Response Scale(RRS-10) across groups with screen-negative or screen-positive depressive symptoms in a large Chinese undergraduate sample.Methods:A total of 7,842 university students finished the RRS-10 and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale(CES-D).According to the cut-off score of CES-D,7,347 subjects were classified as group with screen-negative depressive symptoms,and 495 subjects were classified as screen-positive group with depressive symptoms,respectively.Results:A two-factor model of RRS-10 fit the data reasonably both in group with screen-negative or screen-positive depressive symptoms.And the RRS-10 was equivalent across these two groups.Besides,group with screen-positive depressive symptoms had higher rumination scores than group with screen-negative depressive symptoms.Conclusion:The Chinese version of the RRS-10 had measurement equivalence across groups with screen-negative or screen-positive depressive symptoms in Chinese undergraduates.In addition,individuals with screen-positive depressive symptoms show more rumination than those with screen-negative depressive symptoms.