Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for sacroiliac joint pain: a prospective, randomized, sham-control

来源 :中华物理医学与康复杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:zyweric
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain can cause lower back pain and pelvic discomfort. However, there is no established standard treatment for SIJ pain. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a novel, non-invasive therapeutic modality for musculoskeletal disorders. The mechanism underlying shockwave therapy is not fully understood, but the frequency with which ESWT is applied clinically has increased over the years.

METHODS

Thirty patients with SIJ pain were assigned randomly to ESWT (n=15) and sham control (n=15) groups. The ESWT group received 2,000 shockwaves with energy set to the maximum level tolerable by the patient (energy density=0.09-0.25 mJ/mm2). The probe was oriented perpendicular to the posterior SIJ line, and moved up and down along the joint line. The sham control group received 2,000 shockwaves with the probe oriented parallel to the posterior SIJ line. A 10-cm numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were assessed before the intervention, and 1 and 4 weeks post-intervention. Participants were instructed to refrain from using any other conservative treatment, including anti-inflammatory medication and other physical modalities during the study.

RESULTS

In the ESWT group, NRS decreased significantly at post-treatment week 4 [3.64 (95% confidence interval, 2.29-4.99)] compared to baseline [6.42 (5.19-7.66); P<0.05]. ODI improved at 1 and 4 weeks compared to baseline, but not significantly. In the sham group, NRS and ODI did not differ at any post-treatment time point. There was a significant group difference in NRS at week 4 post-treatment [3.64 (2.29-4.99) in the ESWT group vs. 6.18 (5.34-7.02) in the sham control group; P<0.05], but this was not the case for ODI.

CONCLUSION

ESWT represents a potential therapeutic option for decreasing SIJ pain.

其他文献
目的采用三指对捏进针输液港的方法来探讨其优点。方法选择2018年1-6月经颈内静脉行输液港植入术的患者43例。采用自身对照法,分为试验组和对照组,2组患者均使用安全型蝶翼无损针进针。对照组在2018年7月1-31日采用传统进针法,试验组在2018年8月1-31日采用三指对捏进针法,比较2组患者在一次性进针、局部皮肤出血、患者满意率方面的不同结果。结果对照组一次性进针率和未出血率均为25.6%(11
目的探讨稳定性冠心病患者居家睡眠质量与睡眠信念及态度的相关性。方法采用研究者自行设计的一般资料调查问卷、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表、睡眠信念与态度量表,对390例稳定性冠心病患者进行问卷调查。结果48.2%(188/390)的稳定性冠心病患者存在居家睡眠质量下降的情况,患者匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表得分为(7.99 ± 4.06)分;睡眠信念与态度量表得分为(47.44 ± 9.77)分;单因素方差分析显
目的探讨基于扩展技能循环圈理论的护理迷你临床演练评估(Nursing-Mini-CEX)临床实习教学对本科护生临床实践能力的影响。方法方便抽样法选取实习本科护生为研究对象,2012级42名本科护生为对照组,采用Nursing-Mini-CEX临床教学方案带教,2013级47名本科护生为试验组,采用基于扩展技能循环圈理论的Nursing-Mini-CEX临床教学方案带教。应用Nursing-Mini
目的探讨不同气压治疗时间对预防重症长期卧床患者下肢深静脉血栓形成的效果。方法采取单中心前瞻性随机对照性研究,将120例重症长期卧床患者按照随机数字表法分为常规组、试验组1、试验组2,每组均为40例。常规组采取气压治疗时间为30 min/次,3次/d;试验组1采取气压治疗时间为1 h/次,3次/d;试验组2采取气压治疗时间为2 h/次,3次/d。15 d为1个疗程。观察3组患者15 d内下肢深静脉血
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEExtracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) is effective in the treatment of calcific tendinopathy of the rotator cuff, eliciting an analgesic/anti-inflammatory action and promoti
期刊
目的观察基于肌内神经分布的针刺方法联合常规康复训练和中医推拿对痉挛型脑瘫尖足畸形患儿痉挛程度、踝关节活动度以及粗大运动功能的影响。方法选取符合入选和排除标准的痉挛型脑瘫尖足患儿51例,按随机数字表法将其分为对照组26例和观察组25例。2组患儿均给予常规康复治疗和中医推拿治疗,观察组在上述干预方案基础上增加基于肌内神经分布的中医针刺治疗。常规康复治疗和中医推拿均每日治疗1次,每周治疗5次,连续治疗3
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEExtracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is effective in reducing shoulder pain and improving function in calcific supraspinatus tendinopathy. Eccentric exercise has been introd
期刊
目的观察高压氧(HBO)对永久性大脑中动脉阻塞(MCAO)大鼠凋亡诱导因子(AIF)、半胱氨酸天冬氨酸蛋白酶-3(Caspase-3)的影响,探讨凋亡途径。方法选取SD大鼠60只,制作大鼠永久MCAO模型,按照随机数字表法将其分为对照组和HBO组,每组30只。HBO组造模成功后3 h予以HBO干预,压力0.2 MPa,持续9 h,于HBO干预介入后1 h、3 h、5 h、7 h、9 h吸氧。对照组
目的观察高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)与对侧控制型功能性电刺激(CCFES)不同方式联用时对脑梗死偏瘫患者上肢运动功能的影响。方法采用随机数字表法将80例脑梗死患者分为对照组、同步治疗组、延时1 h组及延时3 h组,每组20例。对照组仅给予常规康复治疗,其余三组均在常规康复干预基础上增加高频rTMS及CCFES治疗;其中同步治疗组在rTMS治疗过程中同步给予CCFES治疗,延时1 h组在rTMS治
目的观察A型肉毒毒素注射治疗卒中后肌张力障碍患者的肌张力、残疾水平和日常生活活动(ADL)能力的影响。方法选取卒中后肌张力障碍患者32例,按随机数字表法分为观察组(16例)和对照组(16例),对照组失访1例,最终31例患者完成本研究。观察组患者给予靶肌肉注射A型肉毒毒素200~600 U,对照组给予盐酸苯海索片2 mg每日2次口服,逐渐加量至4 mg每日3次,共治疗12周。分别于治疗前及治疗2周后