论文部分内容阅读
虽然我对贵学会的宗旨所知甚少,但很显然,这些宗旨发端于对艺术和建筑及其关系的当前状况的深切不满.我将试图说明在我看来这种不良状况的历史原因,并且表明我为什么不像你们那样对于你们所提的对策感到乐观.建立一座艺术大厦的想法首先出现在30年代早期的纳粹德国.这可能是真的,因为纳粹利用艺术的教育功能——或者换个说法,利用宣传——做了许多事.这种滥用不会成为对艺术本身的否定.但如果它是真的(对此我不敢保证),它能揭示一个在我看来关键性的问题:不能要求人们在艺术上花费金钱,除非知道能够从艺术中得到什么.正是在这里,我们的社会不幸地分裂了,而且我或许可以说,陷入了迷茫.人们已经普遍地相信,艺术家所做的事情必然是艺术.我认为,是K·施威特斯说了这句话:
Although I know little about the purpose of your institution, it is clear that these aims originate in my deep dissatisfaction with the current state of art and architecture and their relationships, and I will try to explain the historical causes of my distress, And show why I am not optimistic about what you are saying, as you did. The idea of building an art building first appeared in Nazi Germany in the early 1930s, which may be true because the Nazis use the educational function of the arts - Saying, using propaganda - does a lot of things, and this abuse does not become a denial of art itself, but if it is true (and I can not guarantee it) it reveals a problem that seems to me : People can not be asked to spend their money on the arts unless they know what they can get from the arts. It is here that our society is unfortunately divided and I may be able to say that I am confused. People have generally believed that artists Things to do must be art, and in my opinion, it is K. Schwartz who said this: