论文部分内容阅读
目的对微波治疗髋关节滑膜炎的临床疗效予以评价。方法 68例髋关节滑膜炎患者,按照入院治疗的先后顺序分为对照组和观察组,每组34例。对照组接受常规方法进行治疗,观察组患者在常规治疗方法的基础上联合应用微波治疗。对比两组患者的治疗效果。结果治疗后,观察组患者的数字疼痛评分为(0.45±0.12)分,对照组患者的数字疼痛评分为(2.02±0.45)分,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(t=19.657,P=0.000<0.05)。治疗后,观察组患者治疗后巴塞尔指数为(94.86±4.21)分,对照组患者的巴塞尔指数为(85.17±3.65)分,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(t=10.140,P=0.000<0.05)。治疗后,观察组患者对本次治疗的满意度为97.06%(33/34),对照组患者对本次治疗的满意度为76.47%(26/34),两组比较差异具有统计学意义(χ~2=6.275,P=0.012<0.05)。结论采用常规疗法基础上联合应用微波方法对髋关节滑膜炎患者进行治疗能够显著减轻疼痛感,促使患者更好的恢复正常生活能力,值得在临床中推广。
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of microwave in the treatment of hip synovitis. Methods A total of 68 patients with synovitis of hip joint were divided into control group and observation group according to the order of admission and treatment, with 34 cases in each group. The control group received conventional treatment, the observation group patients combined with microwave treatment based on the conventional treatment. Compare the treatment effect of two groups of patients. Results After the treatment, the digital pain score was 0.45 ± 0.12 in the observation group and 2.02 ± 0.45 in the control group. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (t = 19.657, P = 0.000 <0.05). After treatment, the Basel index was (94.86 ± 4.21) points in the observation group and Baseline index (85.17 ± 3.65) in the control group, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t = 10.140, P = 0.000 <0.05). After treatment, the patients in the observation group were 97.06% (33/34) satisfied with this treatment and the patients in the control group were 76.47% (26/34) satisfied with this treatment. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( χ ~ 2 = 6.275, P = 0.012 <0.05). Conclusion The combination of conventional therapy based on the microwave method of treatment of patients with hip joint synovitis can significantly reduce the pain, prompting patients to better restore normal living ability, it is worth to promote in the clinic.