不久前,一位朋友在评价人文学科集体研究方式时指出,“中国的人文学科在过去很多年出了不少成绩,但作为综合性研究,中国在过去很多年做得很不够,我们的许多集体合作的大部头,并不是真正意义上的合作研究,而是分工写作”。这的确是文史哲领域客观存在的一个需要引起注意的共同问题。过去很长一段时间里,我们在这些领域出版的许多综合性研究成果,其实都是从苏联那里学来的“学术合作社”办法。普遍的做 Not long ago, one of my friends, in assessing the collective study style of the humanities, pointed out: “The humanities in China have made many achievements in the past years. However, as a comprehensive study, China has not done enough for many years in the past. Our The bulk of many collective cooperation is not a real cooperative study but a division of labor. ” This is indeed a common problem requiring attention in the objective existence of the areas of literature, history and philosophy. For a long time now, many of the comprehensive findings we published in these fields were in fact “academic cooperatives” learned from the Soviet Union. Universal to do