论文部分内容阅读
核心期刊的选定标准是“载文量”、“收录量”和“被引次数”,与其刊载论文的水平高低没有必然联系;其选定范围为全国所有期刊,并没有对学术与非学术期刊进行严格的区分。核心期刊不等于刊载优秀论文的学术期刊,它主要是用来供图书馆采购、收藏、导读时作参考的,而不是用来评价学术论文水平的,也不具备这一功能。对此问题,我们需要重新加以研究,如确有必要以期刊作为学术论文的一项评价指标,就必须从实际出发,另行制定标准。
The selection criteria of core journals are “quantity of articles”, “quantity included” and “number of cites”, which are not necessarily related to the level of their published papers. The selection scope of journals is all national journals and there is no comparison between academic and non-academic Periodicals to make a strict distinction. The core journals are not equal to academic journals with excellent essays. They are mainly used for library procurement, collection and guidance. They are not used to evaluate the academic papers, nor do they possess this function. We need to re-examine this issue. If it is necessary to use periodicals as an evaluation index for academic dissertations, we must proceed from reality and set standards separately.