论文部分内容阅读
修改后刑诉法对刑罚的表述多种多样,存在不统一和缺乏明确性的问题,这种状况不利于刑罚的正确理解和司法适用。对此,笔者通过对修改后刑诉法内容的全面考察,从类型化的角度,探讨修改后刑诉法所存在的刑罚表述问题,以期对法典内容的完善有所裨益。一、对修改后刑诉法刑罚表述的类型化分析。在修改后刑诉法290个条文中,可以将法条规范所表述的刑罚内容分为以下三种类型:第一种类型是“以上刑罚类型”。具体又可以划分为三
After the amendment, the criminal procedure law imposes a variety of penalties. There are some problems, such as inconsistencies and lack of clarity. This situation is not conducive to the correct understanding of criminal penalties and the judicial application. In this regard, the author through a comprehensive examination of the revised content of the Criminal Procedure Law, from a type of perspective, to explore the modification of the Criminal Procedure Law existing penalties, in order to improve the content of the Code. First, the revised Criminal Procedure Law, the sentence of the type of analysis. Among the 290 articles amended by the Criminal Procedure Law, the penalties expressed in the rules of the law can be divided into the following three types: The first type is “above penalty type”. Specific and can be divided into three