徐良一案,而今已取得一审的胜利。当这篇杂感问世时,想必二审也已凯旋了。那是应当祝贺他的。然而如何的判决,也终审不掉我对“徐良案”的种种杂感。案件的由头,是上海的文化艺术报登了一位作者写的文章,说的是上海一个会议上,对徐良为来沪演出而“索价三千元”一事究竟是非如何,进行了一番研讨。然而徐良说并没有那回事,于是起诉,告 Xu Liang case, and now has been the first instance victory. When this miscellaneous sense comes out, it is presumed that the second instance has also been triumphant. That is to congratulate him. However, how the verdict, but also ultimately can not get rid of my “Xu Liang case” all kinds of miscellaneous feelings. In the background of the case, an article written by an author was published in Shanghai’s Culture and Art Newspaper. It said that at a conference in Shanghai, what happened to Xu Liang’s performance of “asking 3,000 Yuan for performances in Shanghai” Fan study. However, Xu Liang said that did not happen, so sued, told